The concept of a practice or clinical doctorate has been under discussion within the nurse practitioner (NP) community since before 2001, when the National Organization of NP Faculties (NONPF) established a task force to examine the issues from the NP educational perspective. In October 2004, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) published a position paper focusing on the issue of converting the terminal degree for advanced practice nursing from the master’s to the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) by the year 2015. The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (the Academy, now the American Association of Nurse Practitioners®) and the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners Certification Program participated in these activities as they unfolded. In 2008, the Academy facilitated the Nurse Practitioner Roundtable, a coalition of NP organizations, to consider the current issues surrounding the DNP movement. The coalition published “Nurse Practitioner DNP Education, Certification and Titling: A Unified Statement” in June 2008. In July 2008, the APRN Consensus Work Group and the National Council of State Boards of Nursing APRN Advisory Committee published the “Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification & Education,” a document that establishes a framework for the processes identified in the title and which continues to broadly define APRN at the graduate level.
The rationale for the shift in the academic preparation of nurses in advanced practice focuses on several issues, including the observation that advanced practice nursing is currently one of only a few health care disciplines that prepare its practitioners at the master’s rather than the doctoral level. Most licensed independent practitioners (LIPs) such as podiatrists, psychologists, optometrists, pharmacists, osteopaths, medical doctors and dentists are prepared at the clinical doctoral level. Current master’s and higher degree NP programs fully prepare NPs to be accountable for health promotion, as well as the management of patients with undifferentiated problems and those with acute, complex chronic and/or critical illness. However, it is clear that the coursework currently required in NP master’s programs is equivalent to that of other clinical doctoral programs. It is important, however, that the transition to clinical doctoral preparation for NPs continues to be conducted so that master’s-prepared NPs will not be disenfranchised in any way.
The following issues, therefore, will need to be addressed to ensure that the preparation of NPs at the clinical doctoral level further develops in a logical and equitable fashion.
The evolution of existing master’s programs to practice doctoral programs can add strength to programs and NP practice and can increase recognition in the health care arena. The development of such programs must be conducted in a manner that allows for smooth transitioning.
The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is dedicated to and continues to address these issues as steps are taken to implement activities that would lead to the further development of DNP NP educational programs in the future.
APRN Consensus Work Group & National Council of State Boards of Nursing (2008). APRN Advisory Committee. Consensus model for APRN regulation: Licensure, accreditation, certification & education. Retrieved May 2013.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2004). AACN position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing. Washington, D.C.: Author.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2006). The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Practice Nurses. Retrieved May 2013.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2006). DNP roadmap task force report. Retrieved May 2013.
NONPF (2006). Practice doctorate nurse practitioner entry-level competencies. Retrieved May 2013.
Nurse Practitioner Roundtable (2008). Nurse practitioner DNP education, certification, and titling: A unified statement. Retrieved May 2013.